![](/uploads/1/2/5/8/125858422/393871231.png)
Adobe lightroom 6. In this article, I am going to show you how to install and active adobe lightroom cc 2018 free download full version and latest for windows 10, 8, 8.1, 7 (32/64 bit) and macOS operating system. It is full offline installer standalone setup of Adobe Lightroom CC 2018 for 32 and 64 Bit. Adobe Lightroom CC 2018 Free Download Full Version + Activation Guide. Adobe Lightroom cc 2019 free download with activation guide for windows 10, 8, 8.1, 7 (32/64 bit and macOS Operating system and the new version of adobe lightroom 2019 download with the latest version which is an offline installer. Adobe Lightroom CC 2018 Free Download Full Version. Photoshop light room is the online version where the software is available under the creative cloud system. Compared to Photoshop, you have less tools in Lightroom.
Levis 501 Shrink To Fit Button Fly Jeans Many Colors Many Sizes Denim Rigid. Brand New Levi's. Free Shipping. 184+ Sold 184+ Sold. Levis Men's 501 Original Jeans Size 46x30 Shrink to Fit Blue Raw Unwashed. In order to shrink the document, Word decreases the font size of each font used in the document. You can undo the command by pressing Ctrl + Z. However, after you save the document and close it, there is no quick way to restore the original font size.
Back in 2015, iOS 9 was released and with it Apple changed how Safari handled the initial viewport zoom on page load.
If you are unfamiliar with the change, Ire Aderinokun wrote all about it. But to summarize:
- Apple changed something, as they are ought to do.
- People were dismayed because websites didn’t render as expected (content that would have overflowed horizontally instead caused the screen to shrink).
- People realized they could fix this issue by adding
shrink-to-fit=no
to their viewport meta tag. General applause ensued. - Frameworks, boilerplates and such all adopted this fix and everyone moved on with their lives.
A few years and many updates to iOS later, we continue to include the shrinking fix to our viewport meta tags. However, it seems the scrape has healed and we may not need to keep wearing this band aid.
Proof is in the testing
Using a range of iOS devices and simulations, I’ve been able to confirm that the need for
shrink-to-fit
became irrelevant during the iOS 9 life cycle.Creating reduced test cases of a document without
shrink-to-fit=no
and with shrink-to-fit=no
, I then tested these with the following devices:- iPhone 6 - 9.0 (simulated)
- iPhone 9 - 9.2 (simulated)
- iPad - 9.3.2
- iPod Touch - 9.3.5
- iPhone 6 - 11.0
- iPhone 7 - 10.3 (simulated)
- iPhone XR - 12.1
Quick summary: Apple eventually noticed the kerfuffle they caused and got around to rectifying the issue post iOS 9.2.
Slightly more details:
The 9.0 and 9.2 simulations produced the original issue, necessitating the need for
shrink-to-fit
to rectify Safari automatically shrinking the contents of the screen to fit within the viewport.Testing revealed that from iOS 9.3.2 forward, the need for
shrink-to-fit=no
became irrelevant. Apparently, somewhere between 9.2.1 and 9.3.2 (likely 9.3 as Safari 9.1 was bundled with this release), Apple reverted zooming to work as it had prior to iOS 9.0. No applause ensued because Apple didn’t really make much (any) of a fuss about the fix.If initial zoom was corrected with the release of iOS 9.3, then that means the necessity for
shrink-to-fit
has only declined since March of 2016.So what to do?
Taking a quick peak at iOS market share worldwide, in the last year of data apparently 89.72% of people are/were using iOS 9.3 and up. That’s a pretty good number, especially since the versions of iOS where
shrink-to-fit=no
is needed, is a percentage of that percentage.However, before you go make any changes, you should do an operating system check of your analytics. If you still have quite a bit of traffic coming in with these “shrinking” versions of iOS, then maybe it makes sense to keep
shrink-to-fit=no
. It’s definitely not hurting anything.But, if you’re analytics show that these versions of iOS are nowhere to be found, or their numbers are only indicative of your test devices hitting your website (also good job testing that far back), then it’s probably safe to remove.
At least… until Apple decides to change things again. But we’ll likely need another addition to our meta tag for whatever that change is anyway.
Updated January 8, 2019
Since posting the results of my testing, and using the results as references for pull requests, HTML5 Boilerplate and Josh Buchea’s HEAD repository have accepted the removal of
shrink-to-fit=no
Youtube down. from their recommended viewport meta tags.Speaking of the HEAD repository, Josh Buchea pointed me to these additional stats on iOS usage, indicating that iOS 9.0-9.2.x usage is currently at 0.17%. If these numbers are truly indicative of global use of these versions, then it’s even more likely to be safe to remove
shrink-to-fit
from your viewport meta tag.Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 40 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.
Sign upHave a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
![Excel Excel](http://www.mobilexweb.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/shrink1.png)
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
commented Apr 3, 2016
For responsive websites to be compatible with Safari in Split View, Apple recommends the addition of 'shrink-to-fit=no' to the viewport meta tag (See iOS 9.1 doc) May I submit a PR with this addition? |
commented Aug 8, 2016
AFAICT, it was added because people were using width=device-width, initial-scale=1 without understanding what they do.my concern is that having shrink-to-fit in here would end up with the same result. |
commented Aug 25, 2016
got a good point! |
modified the milestone: 6.0.0Sep 30, 2016
closed this Jul 11, 2017
Merged
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
![](/uploads/1/2/5/8/125858422/393871231.png)